http://calcg.org/newlogo2.png Not Logged in.
Login | Register

General Discussion Board \ Site \ 2 years old??

Click here to log in (you must be logged in to post comments).

AuthorComment
Morgan
Ultralisk
Posted: 24 Nov 2004
02:28 GMT
Total Posts: 321
Is says on the bottom of this page:

Copyright © 2002-2004

Does that mean that CG is only 2 years old?? I know I haven't visited hear that much in the past, but I could have sworn that it was here like 5 years ago...
allynfolksjr
Administrator
avatar
Posted: 24 Nov 2004
06:44 GMT
Total Posts: 1892
The site in its present iteration is ~2 years old.
Barrett
Administrator
avatar
Posted: 24 Nov 2004
11:03 GMT
Total Posts: 1676
2 years 8 months 18 days

---
-Barrett A
TI Freak
Probe
Posted: 1 Dec 2004
09:04 GMT
Total Posts:

Edit
Mine is only 2 years 2 months old, though mine isn't nearly as good as CG.
JcCorp
Probe
Posted: 4 Dec 2004
09:00 GMT
Total Posts:

Edit
How long did it take to make this site? Was it all done from scratch?
allynfolksjr
Administrator
avatar
Posted: 4 Dec 2004
09:16 GMT
Total Posts: 1892
With all of the frame layout and such, I'm guessing it was made using Dreamweaver, or similar program.
Enigma
Probe
Posted: 4 Dec 2004
15:46 GMT
Total Posts: 12
Or sombody was just particularly good with java...

[Edited by Enigma on 05-Dec-04 00:46]
JcCorp
Probe
Posted: 4 Dec 2004
17:41 GMT
Total Posts:

Edit
and how long did it take for this site to get a good amount of visitors?
zkostik
Carrier
avatar
Posted: 4 Dec 2004
20:59 GMT
Total Posts: 2486
>>How long did it take to make this site? Was it all done from scratch?
Yes, the site was made from scratch. We did have some content to put on it when we started it but once layout was made more things were added.
>>With all of the frame layout and such, I'm guessing it was made using Dreamweaver, or similar program.
The layout was first frameless (or just a few frames), then layout changed around to the current one and got a bunch of frame, at a later time Dreamweaver was used to improve the layout and make things nices. It could have been done by hand, but it'd be such a timewaster when nice tools such as DW are available. Tho, DW was quite expensive back then.
>>Or sombody was just particularly good with java...
Well, java would not necessarily be necessary to do that. Since most users have java applets disabled and some don't even have JVM making a website in java for general users would not be a good idea. Also, we didn't want to use iframes because of incompatibility with older browsers. Right now we could use iframes, but we'd still rather have better compatibility.
>>and how long did it take for this site to get a good amount of visitors?
I'm not too sure about the exact time frame, but I know it was a while. Once we got a link from TI, we started to get more visitors and basically became known. In general, we may actually own our existence to the nice webmaster of TI's website for kindly linking to us. Anyway, if I were to guess, we started to get good traffic in about seven months or so. Also, since my personal and Barretts websites got merged into CG any hits from these site went here. I think each site used to bring maybe 10-30 users daily. Not much, but it was a start. I still remember these days when me and B were like "wow, look at that! we've got another registered user today!". Hehe, its kinda interesting how things turned out. Back in those days calc.org was a big and well visited website but now is small comparing to ours. This and last years CG was also pushed into top 100K websites which is quite an achievement. Alright, I've gotta go so I'm going to finish this essay.

---
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
JcCorp
Probe
Posted: 5 Dec 2004
04:59 GMT
Total Posts:

Edit
Z, you always leave these wicked long posts.
RikeenP
Probe
Posted: 5 Dec 2004
08:42 GMT
Total Posts: 2
I got my first calc.(84 plus) three months ago and I've been through 4 sets of batteries. I didn't even know this site existed until 2 months ago. I think people should know more about calulators.


PS>I h8 this ASM stuff( too hard):(
TI Freak
Probe
Posted: 6 Dec 2004
14:03 GMT
Total Posts:

Edit
>>PS>I h8 this ASM stuff( too hard):(

I find the commands fairly easy to understand, I just can't get any bloody compilers to work :(
JcCorp
Probe
Posted: 6 Dec 2004
14:51 GMT
Total Posts:

Edit
Four sets of batteries? I went through 1 my entire 8th grade year!
Xero Xcape
Marine
avatar
Posted: 7 Dec 2004
07:59 GMT
Total Posts: 29
i make wicked long programs and i just let my calc auto shut off. (to save my place)

---
BASIC flames are for n00bs, you don't want to be a n00b do you? | My other calc is a Porsche.
JcCorp
Probe
Posted: 7 Dec 2004
14:09 GMT
Total Posts:

Edit
I do that too.
Krbmeister
Marine
Posted: 7 Dec 2004
20:38 GMT
Total Posts: 37
idn how relovent this is... but i found my way here though ticalc.org... if that means anything to anyone o_0
JcCorp
Probe
Posted: 8 Dec 2004
17:16 GMT
Total Posts:

Edit
I found it from TI's site. They had a link here, and I was acheing to find a decent game site. So I clicked and saw all the neato stuff, and I was hooked.
zkostik
Carrier
avatar
Posted: 8 Dec 2004
19:53 GMT
Total Posts: 2486
Cool. Btw guys, do you think it'd be cool to have a new years chat party with random free gifts or something of that sort like we did last year? I think it may be fun and we do have some financial means to sponsor the gifts. I'll prolly make a topic about that so we can discuss that or you can just PM/email me with ideas if you think it'd be cool.

[Edited by zkostik on 09-Dec-04 04:53]

---
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
darksideprogramming
Guardian
avatar
Posted: 11 Dec 2004
15:02 GMT
Total Posts: 1005
Sounds like a good idea to me.
spiral
Wraith
Posted: 12 Dec 2004
02:08 GMT
Total Posts: 958
do trivia. But I already got calcgames gifts.





Portal | My Account | Register | Lost Password or Username | TOS | Disclaimer | Help | Site Search | File Archives Copyright © 2002-2019 CalcG.org