Author | Comment |
zkostik Carrier
Posted: 17 Feb 2003 10:12 GMT Total Posts: 2486 | hey guys, if someone still have a copy of TI-83+ OS 1.12 please email me a copy. other OS's not on the site would also be cool to have, so if you still got an old one please email it too, or just upload it via our file uploader in a zip format. thanks!
--- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 |
BullFrog Wraith Posted: 18 Feb 2003 17:13 GMT Total Posts: 623 | Hey, I got 1.12. But I e-mailed it to Barrett instead. Hope that's alright with ya...
--- "Men are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds." -Franklin D. Roosevelt |
Barrett Administrator
Posted: 18 Feb 2003 17:45 GMT Total Posts: 1676 | and i posted it
thanks J.
--- -Barrett A |
Digital Guardian
Posted: 18 Feb 2003 18:20 GMT Total Posts: 1051 | you might want to add that the 2.08 ti-89 os will only properly work with hw2 calcs. it scared the crap out of me when the lcd never fully turned off with my hw1 calc. |
BullFrog Wraith Posted: 18 Feb 2003 20:28 GMT Total Posts: 623 | Anytime. AMS 2.08 also works with VTI. When I tried, anyway...
--- "Men are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds." -Franklin D. Roosevelt |
zkostik Carrier
Posted: 18 Feb 2003 22:57 GMT Total Posts: 2486 | k, thanks guys. i'll add a note that AMS 2.08 only works on HW2.
--- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 |
Barrett Administrator
Posted: 19 Feb 2003 12:16 GMT Total Posts: 1676 | well, it works on HW1, but just not the clock
--- -Barrett A |
zkostik Carrier
Posted: 19 Feb 2003 17:20 GMT Total Posts: 2486 | did you try it HW1? i just think that BullFrog isn't the first one i've seen having problems with AMS 2.08 on HW1 calc.
--- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 |
BullFrog Wraith Posted: 19 Feb 2003 18:14 GMT Total Posts: 623 | I never had problems with AMS 2.08 on HW1. I think you mean Digital. But now that you mention it, I did put 2.08 on my friends HW1. Never ran into a problem. Couldn't use the clock, but he never had a any problems with it. Except that maxmem couldn't do much for him... But never had problems.
When he turned his calc off, it did have a couple of lines flash across the screen, but it was doing that anyway with 2.05. Actually, much worse with 2.05...
--- "Men are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds." -Franklin D. Roosevelt |
zkostik Carrier
Posted: 20 Feb 2003 12:39 GMT Total Posts: 2486 | Yeah, sorry I meant Digital. I did however seen people on ticalc having problems with it. Some for instance had it freeze their calc during installation. Well, obviously you can't have clock on HW1 since the chip just doesn't have a clock crystal in it. It's also that many programs for HW2 that are compatible with HW1 did not get updated for AMS 2.08.
--- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 |
zkostik Carrier
Posted: 20 Feb 2003 12:46 GMT Total Posts: 2486 | btw, do you people think it was a nice idea to have OS's on the site? i just though it would be nice coz when you go onto TI's site it takes like forever to find those and they also drag you thru more than 10 pages...actually, if any of you still have old OS's that would be very nice of you to email/upload a copy of it. some older Ti-83+ OS were actually much faster then new ones and TI-89 ones gave more free RAM.
--- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 |
Digital Guardian
Posted: 20 Feb 2003 16:04 GMT Total Posts: 1051 | OS's is a good thing so people can upgrade more easily and test compatability if nescessary.
There are new versions of the OSs for each 68k calcs if you have not heard.
[Edited by Digital on 21-Feb-03 03:22] |
zkostik Carrier
Posted: 20 Feb 2003 22:55 GMT Total Posts: 2486 | Actually, thanks for letting me know. Last time I've been there was after 16th and yet I didn't really read anything. I'll update our versions of OSs as necessary. Hey, this btw sounds quite newsworthy...
--- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 |
zkostik Carrier
Posted: 20 Feb 2003 23:01 GMT Total Posts: 2486 | btw, anyone tried the new AMS 2.08 yet? i would expect it to be more compatible and more bug free than first AMS 2.08 but any feedback would be nice. eventually, i'll end up trying it out myself but right now i have not time for this.
--- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 |
Digital Guardian
Posted: 21 Feb 2003 10:44 GMT Total Posts: 1051 | Look on the message board on ticalc.org. One person ran a bit to bit or Byte to byte comparison and said that they were identical. |
Barrett Administrator
Posted: 21 Feb 2003 12:22 GMT Total Posts: 1676 | they fixed TI connect to work with AMS 2.08, not the other way around
--- -Barrett A |
zkostik Carrier
Posted: 21 Feb 2003 16:52 GMT Total Posts: 2486 | ah, i see. this is probably why this AMS retains its name.
--- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 |
BullFrog Wraith Posted: 21 Feb 2003 18:46 GMT Total Posts: 623 | How come you guys haven't added the "new" 2.08 for the 92+/V200 yet?
--- "Men are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds." -Franklin D. Roosevelt |
zkostik Carrier
Posted: 21 Feb 2003 23:18 GMT Total Posts: 2486 | sorry, i'm very loaded with work and had no time. i already downloaded and zipped new OS's just didn't get to upload them to CG. i'm gonna add them tomorrow (or well, today after i get some sleep). also, in case you don't know OS's don't show up in recent files, so check OS page for updates. in fact, i'll probably end up posting a news article just to keep news alive.
--- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 |
Barrett Administrator
Posted: 22 Feb 2003 10:15 GMT Total Posts: 1676 | keep them low profile Z... if TI finds out they'll have a fit.
--- -Barrett A |
zkostik Carrier
Posted: 22 Feb 2003 10:33 GMT Total Posts: 2486 | oki, i've added those new OSs. i don't really think TI will start b******g, we afterall even show their license. this software is free and we in no way provide any pirated stuff, only whatever is freely available on the net. i see no particular reason for TI not to like this, besides TI only wanting to distribute OSs from their site. afterall, we're not breaking any laws or anything. and nowhere it says on TI's site OSs can only be downloaded from there. its not like we're distributing ROMs or anything.
--- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 |
zkostik Carrier
Posted: 22 Feb 2003 10:37 GMT Total Posts: 2486 | you btw B probably want to make a news article saying new AMS was released even if not directly linking to our files you may have a link to OS section. or well, just make a news thing. this is quite some news and our news (and all calc stuff overall) has been pretty slow for months.
--- 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 |
Barrett Administrator
Posted: 22 Feb 2003 10:47 GMT Total Posts: 1676 | Z, both AMS 2.08's are IDENTICAL. there is not an OLD and NEW one, they are the exact same. TI just released it again because they fixed TI-Connect
--- -Barrett A |
Barrett Administrator
Posted: 23 Feb 2003 16:36 GMT Total Posts: 1676 | so yeah, when i have time i'll remove one and rename the other one to just plain "AMS 2.08" cus they are the exact same file... this won't be for a few days though, so if you have time Z, could you remove one?
--- -Barrett A |