| Author | Comment |
zkostik
Carrier
Posted: 23 Sep 2004
10:04 GMT
Total Posts: 2486 | Well, I know its been some time since TI release this AMS. Has anyone tried it yet? Is it still as buggy as 2.06-2.08? Not like I'm planning to upgrade but I kinda wanted to know what exactly is new in it besides clock, few functions and desktop feat (well, new AMS prolly has USB support too).
---
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 |
Digital
Guardian
Posted: 23 Sep 2004
10:09 GMT
Total Posts: 1051 | I would say go with a V200, but I'm biased. I have one. The titanic is the upgrade for the 89 equivalent to the V200 being the upgrade for the 92+, except for the USB. |
allynfolksjr
Administrator
Posted: 23 Sep 2004
15:28 GMT
Total Posts: 1892 | Erm, I'm not aware of any changes other than what you already mentioned Z. It almost seems like TI considers the new AMS versions to be perfected.... |
BullFrog
Wraith
Posted: 24 Sep 2004
15:08 GMT
Total Posts: 623 | I don't know if AMS 3.0 will work on the regular 89's. Therefore, I don't really care much about it...
---
"Men are not prisoners of fate, but only prisoners of their own minds." -Franklin D. Roosevelt |
allynfolksjr
Administrator
Posted: 24 Sep 2004
15:16 GMT
Total Posts: 1892 | I'm pretty sure it won't. The memory addresses are slightly changed, among other things, but if you really wanted to, I guess you could, with some OS code changes.... |
zkostik
Carrier
Posted: 24 Sep 2004
20:58 GMT
Total Posts: 2486 | Yeah, you're right...AMS 3.0 is only for 89T. 89/V200 top out at AMS 2.09 which has already been out for some time. Ho well guys, don't bother wasting any more time on that topic. I was just wondering is there were anything new in 3.0. Not a big deal coz it's not like I'm planning to upgrade anyway.
---
09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 |
